Gilberto Agostinho <gilbertohasnofb <at> gmail.com> writes: > 1) Some ugly positioning when using \pitchedTrill:
This was from an intentional change to place things as close as they fit http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2527 but it should have come with padding. I added http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3630 A good workaround is \override TrillPitchGroup #'horizon-padding = #0.10 > 2) This one I am a bit less sure if it is not happening due to some misuse > of mine. I am trying to get completely flat beams by using \override > Beam.concaveness = #+inf.0 (as far as I understand, the higher the value of > the concaveness the flatter are the beams). So it works well for almost > every group of notes, EXCEPT when there is a note and a rest beamed > together: > { \override Beam.concaveness = #+inf.0 > \time 12/8 > a'8[ r d'] e8[ r r] a,8[ r r] a'''8[ r r] } I hesitate to enter a bug report for this. The 'concaveness' is meant to describe the pattern of note-heads where traditionally we prefer horizontal beams. The rest moves in response to the beam, so for a beam between a single note and rest I am not surprised that 'concaveness' has no effect -- the single note cannot have a concave pattern so 'concaveness' is not checked. Maybe Beam.damping = +inf.0 should make the beam horizontal for a rest and note beamed together (it does not work currently). You can use \once\override Beam.positions = #'(0 . 0) _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
