Steven Weber wrote > Laziness. The movement I'm typesetting is 600+ measures long with tons of > time changes, and only 15 measures of that are split. That's why LP > allows > this kind of construct in the first place, no? Because we still don't > have > a good way to say "skip the next 500 measures, regardless of their > length."
what's your code so far (to eliminate time, key or clef indications)? Eluze -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Multi-measure-rests-before-a-new-temporary-staff-is-added-tp153390p153399.html Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
