2013/11/29 David Kastrup <[email protected]>: > Janek Warchoł <[email protected]> writes: >> I see the override in ly/engraver-init.ly, and i tracked the code back >> to its first appearance 12 years ago: >> >> commit 1539b48e9bd7cd7698e602dc3d3dbe74a6567a49 >> Author: Han-Wen Nienhuys <[email protected]> >> Date: Sat Sep 8 20:11:09 2001 +0200 >> >> release: 1.5.9 >> >> but i haven't found any rationale _why_ rhythmic staff barlines should >> be so long. > > That likely predates any attempt to make the bar lines for 1- and 0-line > staves visible at all.
Indeed. >>> In contrast, DrumStaff has normal bar lines matching the system, and >>> linecounts of 1 and smaller lead to the fallback of 3-line system >>> dimensions. >>> >>> Personally, I find the RhythmicStaff bar lines a bit excessive. But >>> changing them would be _quite_ an incompatible change. >> >> Hmm. I think we should change it. The default behaviour (i.e. >> ensuring that the barline is at least 2 ss long) seems perfect to me. > > There is an orchestral example in Documentation/ly-examples.ly that > makes heavy use of RhythmicStaff. You should probably take a look at > the difference your change would make with that. It looks ok. http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3685 Janek _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
