Ralph Palmer <[email protected]> writes: > Hi, everyone - > > I'm a little confused. I've been entering issues as "Ugly" which don't > really seem to fit. Should they be "Defect"s? What would constitute a > defect in the core program? For example, would the ambitus problems > recently reported be better classified as defects?
Yes. > I appreciate your time and attention, I think "Ugly" means bad decisions, usually based on insufficient detail in the algorithms. "Defect" means that things go different than intended by the programmer. There is some overlap, but if staves are not getting removed that should be or vice versa, that's "Defect" in my opinion. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
