Hello,
On 21/12/13 07:58, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 20.12.2013 21:25, schrieb James:
On 18/12/13 06:18, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 18.12.2013 07:15, schrieb Mike Solomon:
On Dec 18, 2013, at 1:00 AM, Urs Liska <[email protected]>
wrote:
If I parentesize a dotted note with
{ \parenthesize f'2. }
the right paren collides with the dot.
Urs
Do you want the dot to shift to avoid the collision or the
parenthesis to encompass the dot?
Cheers,
MS
Hm, from the example itself it would seem better to shift the dot, but
I'm not sure about the tradeoffs when you have a more complex
situation, i.e. with more than one dot, e.g.
{ < \parenthesize f'2. a'> }
Urs
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Well there was
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=155
Is this applicable? If so we could change the subject to reflect dots
and accidentals - I don't know if dots and accidentals are the same
'family' of attached objects or if it warrants a separate tracker.
James
From a user's perspective I'd say it is _one_ issue that \parenthesize
should take care of what to enclose. However, I don't know if these
are two different things from the implementation POV (i.e. if the two
problems can/should be solved together).
Urs
OK I created
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3750
I figured it would be easier to mark an issue as a dupe than pick apart
multiple issues from one tracker.
James
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
