Federico Bruni-5 wrote
> If you comment the code in this snippet the result is the same:
>
> \version "2.18.0"
>
> \relative c'' {
> %{ \once \override Score.BreakAlignment.break-align-orders =
> #(make-vector 3 '(instrument-name
> left-edge
> ambitus
> breathing-sign
> clef
> key-signature
> time-signature
> staff-bar
> custos))
> \once \override Staff.TimeSignature.space-alist =
> #'((first-note . (fixed-space . 2.0))
> (right-edge . (extra-space . 0.5))
> ;; free up some space between time signature
> ;; and repeat bar line
> (staff-bar . (extra-space . 1)))
> %}
> \bar ".|:"
> c1
> d1
> d4 e f g
> }
>
> Should it be removed from the documentation?
I think in real music most often the first (opening) repeat bar is omitted
in the 1st measure.
other opinions?
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/NR-1-4-1-printing-a-repeat-sign-at-the-beginning-of-a-piece-ly-is-obsolete-since-2-18-tp157541p157581.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
