On 24/03/14 14:45, Rutger Hofman wrote:
On 03/24/2014 01:50 PM, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:> Gilberto Agostinho wrote
The correct syntax is with the "s" [...]

I meant without.... without the "s", as in "repeat" and NOT "repeats"
Rutger Hofman-2 wrote
[...]
As a fix, I made a small addition to music-functions.scm to add a
dodecaphonic-first accidental style. Patch against 2.17.18-1 attached.
[...]
Using dodecaphonic-first and adding ! here and there works fine for me.

I already apologize for replying to an old post (almost 1 year old!), but I
am really interested in this dodecaphonic-first accidental style. The
problem is I do not know how to deal with this .patch file!

Right, so there is a new style dodecaphonic-no-repeat from 2.19.3 onwards. But it does something else than the style dodecaphonic-first that I wrote about, long ago. dodecaphonic-no-repeat suppresses accidentals for immediately repeated notes. dodecaphonic-first suppresses accidentals for any notes that already occurred earlier in the bar. My opinion is that there is still good use for dodecaphonic-first; the main reason is that wiping out undesired accidentals leaves visible traces because it consumes horizontal space, whereas adding occasional forced accidentals works fully as desired.

I would love it if the dodecaphonic-first style can be patched into lilypond; not only for the Greater Good, but also to relieve me from applying it to each and every lilypond release, and maintaining it across changes...

I renewed the patch for versions from 2.19.3 upwards. It is attached (pre-2.19.3 and 2.19.3 onwards; it used to be a reverse-patch, no longer now). It is extremely small. I also keep it in my github repo for lilypond additions, in the patches/ dir:

https://github.com/rfhh/lily-contribs

That repo currently also contains my converter from NIFF to lilypond (and the NIFF sdk, with 64-bit patch), and an upgraded version of Han-Wen's pmx2ly converter that I used to prepare an edition of Bach's BWV 146/1052a (on IMSLP).

Rutger





--
View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/dodecaphonic-first-accidental-style-tp141907p160773.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user




_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
adding 'bug'

I've created http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3889

However if you want a proper review/test can you upload to reitveld as per our process else this won't get the review it might.

If you need help on doing this let us know.

James
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Reply via email to