2014-06-12 15:05 GMT+02:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider <[email protected]>: > 2014-05-31 23:46 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley <[email protected]>: > >> >> Why do you write 'ly:clef::print'? >> >> Can't see any sense in it. Deleting it makes no difference. > > > Hi Harm, > I fixed all concerned snippets for a couple of days (see preveiw problems > here > http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/No-LSR-preview-was-quot-More-questions-about-using-Lilypond-quot-td163235.html) > with one exception : http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=903 : > At the end of the code you'll see : > > \override KeySignature.stencil = #(lambda (grob) > > (ly:stencil-translate-axis > > (ly:stencil-scale > > (ly:key-signature-interface::print grob) -1 1) 3 X)) > > > deleting "ly:key-signature-interface::print grob" will create an error. > > So I've finally found an interest for this code line at least for the key > signature. ;) > > Cheers, > > Pierre > > > Has nothing to do with key-signature in particular. Here the procedure `ly:key-signature-interface::print' is applied to `grob', outputting the default-stencil for use with `ly:stencil-scale' and `ly:stencil-translate-axis' Whereas in the example from my initial mail `ly:clef::print' did nothing, afaict.
Btw, meanwhile I approved all pending LSR-snippets, sometimes I did some editing. Snippet 878 remains unapproved due to the discussion starting here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-05/msg00713.html Cheers, Harm _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
