On 19/07/14 23:25, Karol Majewski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems that binding-offset size scales accordingly to global-staff-size,
> which of course is a bug:
>
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>
> \version "2.19.10"
>
> #(set-global-staff-size 20)
>
> \paper {
> top-markup-spacing = #'((basic-distance . 0) (minimum-distance . 0)
> (padding . 0) (stretchability . 0))
> two-sided = ##t
> binding-offset = 2\cm
> }
>
> \bookpart {
> \header {
> poet = \markup { \abs-fontsize #13 "left" }
> composer = \markup { \abs-fontsize #13 "right" }
> }
> \score {
> \new Staff { d'4 }
> }
> }
>
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>
> Now, change global-staff-size to smaller and you'll notice that inner-margin
> becomes smaller too! However, when binding-offset is disabled, changing
> global-staff-size does not affect inner-margin size.
>
> Best
> --Karol
Actually that is not a minimal example.
You don't need the
'top-markup-spacing' line
It seems to me (from my limited playing about with 2.19.8) that if you
comment out either/or 'two-sided' or 'binding-offset' then the problem
'goes away'. So is this a 'binding-offset' issue or a 'two-sided' issue?
regards
James
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
