David Winfrey <[email protected]> writes: > Keith OHara <k-ohara5a5a <at> oco.net> writes: >> >> Phil Holmes <mail <at> philholmes.net> writes: >> > >> > But if you enter b4 in F major, you'll get a natural typeset, so there >> can >> > be no confusion. It seems like you're effectively proposing that b4 is a >> b >> > natural I've entered accidentally, but bn4 is one I've entered >> deliberately. >> > How would Lily show the difference? >> > >> >> As I understand David, Lily need not show any difference. >> Accepting the explicit bn helps the user read his own input. > > This is what I meant; there would be no difference in the output. > The Lilypond parser would simply ignore 'n' if it finds 'n' when > it expects an accidental or note.
As my musical education and practice is from a different note language, I cannot really say much about the motivation of that approach. In my country one would never call a "cis" just "c" when talking about music, not even informally (but then nobody wants to get caught being informal anyway). Is this really significantly different in English? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
