2014-09-14 18:34 GMT+03:00 David Kastrup <[email protected]>: > TorbjörnBjörkman <[email protected]> writes: > > > I try to hide the first stem in a beam group and expect this to keep the > > beam, just as happens if you hide any other stem in the group. However, > the > > whole beam goes away. > > > > I run lilypond version 2.18.2 on a Mac. > > > > Code snippet that demonstrates the issue follows. The first two beam > groups > > show the expected behaviour and the last fails. This seems to be a bug. > > > > Best regards, > > Torbjörn Björkman > > > > \score{ > > \new Staff > > \relative c' { > > \cadenzaOn > > c8[ e \once \hide Stem f] > > c[ \once \hide Stem e f] > > \once \hide Stem c[ e f] > > } > > } > > That's the intended consequence of issue 2866 > <URL:https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2866>. > > Rereading the issue, I'm not quite sure about the exact rationale but > the main motivation appears to stem from automatic rather than manual > beams. > > The report mentions a number of other issue reports. The implementation > of the change was through > > dak@lola:/usr/local/tmp/lilypond$ git log -p bd599be12 > commit bd599be12a872b9ca95ebc78e0880e2d13c26b4f > Author: Keith OHara <[email protected]> > Date: Tue May 14 21:53:25 2013 -0700 > > Beams: be transparent if the first stem is transparent; issue 2866 > > so that \hideNotes does not hide automatic beams that could have, > but did not, start on a hidden note. > > though I provided an initial version of the patch. > > -- > David Kastrup > > > _______________________________________________ > bug-lilypond mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond >
OK. Does this mean that there is currently no way of hiding the first stem while keeping the beam? Regards, Torbjörn Björkman -- ====================================== Torbjörn Björkman _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
