On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 12:53:53PM +0100, James wrote: > I think we could improve the notes in the contributor's Guide > generally. Having had to help three or four people over the last few > months with a patch or two, I get how the instructions are probably > rather confusing if not intimidating.
I think the most important point would be to have a single checklist for what should be done. Two years ago, the CG had at least three such lists, and I was aware of mistakes in two of them. I don't know what's changed sinc then, though. Having a single list has two advantages: it's an obvious thing to refer to, and since it focuses attention from both readers and CG-writers, mistakes should be more obvious (and thus easier to fix). Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
