2014-11-30 15:13 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup <[email protected]>:

> > \revert Flag.stencil looks like a typo here (btw, already there in the
> > v2.14 litterature).
>
> Not really.  It would seem to have appeared with
>
> commit 72fb864be8e82de810b25a6f39f3f460b7f2b78f
> Author: Graham Percival <[email protected]>
> Date:   Tue Oct 25 12:01:00 2011 +0100
>
>     Run update-with-convert-ly.sh
>
> And of course the real culprit is
>
> commit 671b7b63408893c33b4c1f196e87db19a7dbcd1e
> Author: Mike Solomon <[email protected]>
> Date:   Mon Oct 24 08:20:52 2011 +0200
>
>     Creates convert-ly rules to destencil Flags when \override Stem
> #'stencil = ##f
>
> Now there is another commit after that:
>
> commit f299c35871038f6d0c959935dcf5f81e29372b86
> Author: David Kastrup <[email protected]>
> Date:   Mon Oct 24 16:03:00 2011 +0200
>
>     Improve 671b7b6... Creates convert-ly rules to destencil Flags
>
> touching the same rules, but it only polishes the whitespace inserted
> for the additional lines.
>
> Basically the rule here is that _any_ revert on the Stem also gets a
> revert on the Flag.  Audacious.
>
>
> It would make sense to review _all_ of
>
> commit 72fb864be8e82de810b25a6f39f3f460b7f2b78f
> Author: Graham Percival <[email protected]>
> Date:   Tue Oct 25 12:01:00 2011 +0100
>
>     Run update-with-convert-ly.sh
>
> and see whether the application of this somewhat eager convert-ly rule
> created other problems.
>

Ok
Pierre
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Reply via email to