Dan Eble <dan <at> faithful.be> writes:

> 
> Is it expected that these two ways of changing the appearance of 
> a rest yield different spacing between the rest and the dot?

I would not think so.
The dot is placed a standard distance right of the x-extent of the rest
glyph, which should be the same in either case.  If you see a difference,
you probably enough scheme to print the X-extents of the rest in each 
case to see if there is a difference.

(I do not see any difference in the output when I try your example.)




_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Reply via email to