Dan Eble <d...@faithful.be> writes:
> On Apr 7, 2015, at 00:23 , Pierre Perol-Schneider
> <pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> 2015-04-07 3:35 GMT+02:00 Dan Eble <d...@faithful.be
>> <mailto:d...@faithful.be>>:
>> % Is this supposed to leave a stem showing?
>> \version "2.19.17"
>> \hide c''4
>>
>> Yes, because equivalent to:
>>
>> \version "2.19.17"
>> {
>> \tweak transparent ##t c''4
>> }
>>
>> (AFAIK)
>
> Equivalence doesn’t really answer the question. Why would a
> transparent C have a stem?
So what do you expect for
{ <\hide c'' e''>4 }
Stem or no stem?
I might add that
{ <\single\hide Stem c'' g''>4 }
hides the Stem (since its cause points to the c'' NoteHead) while
{ <c'' \single\hide Stem g''>4 }
doesn't hide it (since its cause points to the c'' NoteHead).
So it's somewhat tricky to derive a consistent behavior here.
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
