Well, that seems like a very specific use case. And you may easily work
around using
\version "2.19.17"
{
\stopStaff s1 \once\omit Staff.BarLine \break
\startStaff a \stopStaff
}
I agree that one might expect not to have a lonely bar line there, but
it is printed regardless of the break. Can you give a convincing reason
why this would be wrong?
Yours, Simon
Am 14.05.2015 um 20:42 schrieb musicus:
\version "2.19.17"
{
\stopStaff s1 \break
\startStaff a \stopStaff
}
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Sure, the \break is not necessary to demonstrate the "lonely bar". Every
time you use \startStaff again at the beginning of a system, the upper
system has the bar at its end.
The problem with \once \omit Staff.BarLine is, that you must know, where
your breaks are and you have to use it every single time.
"Can you give a convincing reason why this would be wrong?"
Why would you want to have a lonely BarLine without a Staff or musical
content?
Yours, musicus
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
