Am 01.07.2015 um 22:34 schrieb Thomas Morley:
2015-07-01 21:54 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht <[email protected]>:
Hello,
If there are only skips (s) between two \mark commands, these will be
ignored, a warning given about simultaneous marks, and everything following
in this (input) music expression will not be engraved. It boils down to the
following:
\version "2.19.22"
% same with 2.18
%{
The problem:
Warning about Two simultaneous mark events &c.
All the following music will be junked
Test cases:
Same duration – \default given – problem
Same duration – \default not given – no problem
Different durations – \default given – problem
Different durations – \default not given – problem
%}
{
\mark
s4
\mark \default
s
}
I submitted Issue 4472
<https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4472>, but wanted to
‘announce’ it here also. It’s quite confusing that it interferes with
\default given or not, isn’t it?
Best regards, Simon
The mark-function needs an argument, see:
#(display mark)
This code: { \mark s4 \mark \default s4 } puts in s4 as the argument
for the first \mark.
Besides it's nonsense, you then have two simultaneous marks.
For this code: { \mark \default s4 \mark \default s4 } be aware that
SkipEvents do not create a NoteColumn.
Meaning both RehearsalMarks try to align themselves to the same item,
as given with the 'break-align-symbols'-property.
At least this is my understanding.
Thus I see no bug here.
You’re right, of course.
I only wonder how I came by the notion that \mark would also work with
the \default argument omitted – I could have sworn there was some kind
of parser lookahead or so to provide for that case. Either this is
outdated info or I deeply confused something. Should have modestly asked
before racking my head on the ‘bug’ report :-)
Thanks for clarifying.
Yours, Simon
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
