On Aug 13, 2015, at 09:36 , Simon Albrecht <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 01.08.2015 um 19:35 schrieb Dan Eble: >> add a variant of \include which does nothing if the file does not exist >> (eliminating one reason to have empty files in the first place) […] > surely we would want \include to complain if there has been a typo and it > should actually refer to an existing file. Since it’s hardly possible for > Lily to decide about the user’s intentions here, we might perhaps provide > another function with the behaviour you describe
That is what I had in mind when I wrote “a variant of \include”. Regards, — Dan _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
