On 9/22/2015 10:43 AM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote: > tisimst <[hidden email] > </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=181539&i=0>> writes: > > > On 9/22/2015 9:42 AM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote: > >> Pierre Perol-Schneider <[hidden email] > >> </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=181534&i=0>> writes: > >> > >> >>I'm not top posting > >> > > >> > Hi Squad, > >> > > >> > When many grace notes, staves are miss aligned: > >> > > >> > %%%%%%%%%% > >> > \version "2.19.27" > >> > > >> > \transpose c c' { > >> > \repeat unfold 16 { e'8 a } > >> > R1*8 > >> > } > >> > > >> > \transpose c c' { > >> > \repeat unfold 16 { \grace dis'8 e' \grace gis8 a } > >> > R1*8 > >> > } > >> > %%%%%%%%%%%%%% > >> > >> Huh? That example demonstrates that measures with many grace notes in > >> them will take more space than _independently_ typeset measures > without > >> the grace notes in them. > >> > >> Which is not surprising at all. What is the misalignment you are > >> talking about? > > > > I think this is what he meant (first as separate scores, then in the > > same score): > > > > > > > > The notes line up, but the second system doesn't break/compress like it > > should. > > > > - Abraham > > > > > > fbbigajb.png (87K) > > > <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/attachment/181536/0/fbbigajb.png> > > Well, stuff lines up perfectly on my system. So where's the difference? > 64-bit system vs 32-bit (the latter would be mine)? Different fonts > (less likely)?
Sounds like it might be OS-specific. I'm on Windows 7, 64-bit, LilyPond 2.19.27, using default fonts. - Abraham -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Grace-notes-and-staff-miss-alignment-tp181529p181540.html Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond