Hi Gilberto,
there’s no point in discussing off-list.
On 18.10.2015 17:33, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
> Which it can, and though it may not be up to your preferences, the
output is unambiguous, understandable and correct.
The output is ambiguous
It is inconsistent, that’s true, since R1 is taken into account for its
full length, whereas R1*N isn’t. Seems like the barline/end of measure
makes the difference.
But it’s unambiguous, which means that the reader will know either way
that the second voice is silent, whether through a rest or through a
textual Solo [I] indication.
I forgot to mention: You can change this indication using
\layout {
\context {
\Voice
soloText = "Solo I"
}
}
– at least I might like that better.
the output should be at least equal
Agreed.
\version "2.19.28"
{
\partcombine
{R1 | \partcombineApart r2 b' | \partcombineAutomatic c''1 |}
{R1*2 | f'1 |}
}
{
\partcombine
{R1 | \partcombineApart r2 b' | \partcombineAutomatic c''1 |}
{R1 | R1 | f'1 |}
}
If no one else will give some more founded comment on this, I’ll raise
an issue from this.
Yours, Simon
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
