David Kastrup <[email protected]> writes: > While replacing "a a" with "a" seems like a good idea, this is actually > "a\na" which you replace so you should break the line somewhere close to > the change. The formatted output will likely be the same, but avoiding > an overfull source line is better style.
Thanks for the hint! Should I make a new patch just for this tiny change? I'd rather include this in a future patch with more no-brainers!? Patrick _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
