Dave Plater <[email protected]> writes: >> On 07/02/2016 14:16, Simon Albrecht wrote: >>> This would rather be a case for the bug list. >>> >>> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >>> Subject: lilypond-book/pdflatex: LaTeX Error: Environment >>> lilypond undefined. >>> Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 11:58:51 +0200 >>> From: Dave Plater <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi, I maintain lilypond in openSUSE and while I'm good at building and >>> packaging I'm far from competent as a lilypond user. A user has filed a >>> bug with the title listed in this messages subject. Could somebody >>> please have a quick look and maybe offer a hint as to what is causing >>> it. See : >>> https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=964357 > > Unfortunately I'm only subscribed to this list and just wondered if > somebody could tell me if this is actually a bug or the wrong usage of > lilypond-book. Lilypond-2.18.2 being very mature I would have expected > there to have been a bug report already but I can't find any.
That looks like LilyPond-book being only half-functional, assuming that the given lilybook.lytex file is well-formed (not exactly a given either). In that case, I would suspect the culprit to be the wrong Python version: LilyPond's Python scripts require Python 2 to be run. I don't know how typical packagers may ensure that this is the case. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
