Thomas Morley <[email protected]> writes: > 2016-04-27 11:25 GMT+02:00 Graham King <[email protected]>: >> thanks Harm, >> >> On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 01:18 +0200, Thomas Morley wrote: >> >> Hi Graham, >> >> I guess at the point of time \omit DynamicText is applied the bounds >> of the Hairpin (and so the extension of it) is already calculated. >> >> So \omit DynamicText works, but the Hairpin still keeps it's extension. >> >> >> You know the internals and I don't, but this doesn't seem quite right. >> \omit DynamicText seems to produce a hairpin that is slightly longer than >> the hairpin produced in the presence of dynamics: > > Well, obviously I was wrong or at least not entirely correct. > The Hairpin, bound by DynamicText, is calculated in a complex manner. > I ran against walls before ... > > Looks like the already established bounds are respected in some way > even if their stencil is set #f
Maybe DynamicLineSpanner is also involved in some manner? I never quite got how the dynamics are organized here. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
