Timothy Lanfear <[email protected]> writes: > Fonts for the header fields are not set correctly for the second and > subsequent books in a file. > > Pre-built version 2.19.45, 64-bit Linux. > > \version "2.19.45" > > \header { title = "Title" composer = "Composer" } > > \book { \score { a'1 } } > \book { \score { a'1 } }
Interesting. dak@lola:/tmp$ ls -l gaga*.pdf -rw-rw-r-- 1 dak dak 15033 Jul 10 11:31 gaga-1.pdf -rw-rw-r-- 1 dak dak 41971 Jul 10 11:31 gaga.pdf dak@lola:/tmp$ pdffonts gaga.pdf name type encoding emb sub uni object ID ------------------------------------ ----------------- ---------------- --- --- --- --------- LQFAMB+Emmentaler-20 Type 1C Custom yes yes no 12 0 IDXJFX+TeXGyreSchola-Bold Type 1C WinAnsi yes yes no 8 0 ENLKFF+TeXGyreSchola-Regular Type 1C Custom yes yes no 10 0 dak@lola:/tmp$ pdffonts gaga-1.pdf name type encoding emb sub uni object ID ------------------------------------ ----------------- ---------------- --- --- --- --------- LQFAMB+Emmentaler-20 Type 1C Custom yes yes no 12 0 RSRUFC+TeXGyreSchola-Bold Type 1C WinAnsi yes yes no 8 0 YMRISQ+TeXGyreSchola-Regular Type 1C Custom yes yes no 10 0 So it's the same fonts that claim to be embedded but the second PDF file still has only 1/4 of the size. And, well, indeed the titles look less than convincing, obviously using some emergency substitute. This does not happen with a LilyPond executable claiming to be 2.19.44 (so it is from some compilation between 2.19.43 and 2.19.44) so it is a fairly recent problem. Should not be exercising any of the new \header code from me I think, so it's more likely to be a newly introduced bug in font handling. Will bisect. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
