On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Andrew Bernard
> Don't you have to provide an argument for \mark, I thought?
> I am not familiar with 2.18.2, but in 2.19.48 you do:
Yep. I think \mark requiring an argument explains the errors in the
- The first error it saying that the argument you gave to \mark was wrong
- Lilypond kept trying to make sense of things and kept processing.
Since the argument to \mark was already used there is now 1 too few
beats in that measure.
I think lilypond is behaving as expected here. You might be trying to
do \mark \default or \mark "C" instead.
bug-lilypond mailing list