Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org> writes: > Am 28. März 2017 18:41:55 MESZ schrieb David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>:
>>This is not how (binary) floating point works. >> >>100.1 may well be 100.0999999999997 or similar. There is absolutely no >>issue with letting LilyPond _accept_ non-integers. But I don't see a >>plan how it could or should then go about formatting them. >> > > So does this point to accepting a stribg argument without implications > to thr actual tempo? > Of course this wouldn't be much morr than simplifying a markup entry. Get the cat off the keyboard. I don't know what form and meaning you expect a stribg argument to take. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
