Yuri <[email protected]> writes: > On 08/17/17 09:23, David Kastrup wrote: >> Touching the font cache when converting the documentation with >> Ghostscript from PS to PDF might just be a side effect of running the >> system's Ghostscript. In that case, it would be more a problem of BSD >> than of LilyPond. > > > No, it's not ghostscript. My OP has the full stack identifying the > line. It is called from the lilypond executable.
Ok, but LilyPond also accesses the system fonts when building its documentation. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
