----- Original Message ----- From: "David Kastrup" <[email protected]>
> I had recently upgraded my system to 64bit and now > have been able to install the default Ubuntu 2.18.2. I was interested > to see how they dealt with Guile no longer being in distribution. > > dak@lola:/tmp$ ldd /usr/bin/lilypond > not a dynamic executable > dak@lola:/tmp$ file /usr/bin/lilypond > /usr/bin/lilypond: POSIX shell script, ASCII text executable > dak@lola:/tmp$ cat /usr/bin/lilypond > #!/bin/sh > export LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lilypond/2.18.2/guile" > exec "/usr/bin/lilypond.real" "$@" > > O.K. > > Not bad at all. Maybe we should create some advice for packagers? This > here is way better than "muddle through with the current Guile-2.0 state > and let your users alone with the problems". That does indeed seem quite elegant, and neatly solves the problem caused by the move of the distribution to Guile-2. Could we make a similar change to our own, i.e. LilyPond's, distributions? Trevor --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
