Knut Petersen <[email protected]> writes: > Hi David! > >> The takeaway for this is that extenders at the current point of time >> often don't work as expected and are pretty hard to make do something >> useful. I have a hard time figuring out what the current behavior is >> supposed to be good for, or what the rules governing it actually are. > > Well, you might remember that there is code > <https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4509/> that improves > the current LyricExtender syntax.
Uh no, it doesn't? It _removes_ the current LyricExtender syntax, then tries to do the right thing by itself. Interpreting user input sensibly and ignoring user input altogether are not the same thing. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
