Aaron Hill <lilyp...@hillvisions.com> writes: > On 2018-06-07 06:34, Aaron Hill wrote: >> Hi David, >> >> Correct me if I am wrong, but the second definition is ***not*** >> usable as a >> function. That is, it cannot accept a parameter for customizing the >> markup. Unless `\etc` is something magical that is undocumented, the >> resulting `\doubleBox` would have to be a complete idea. > > (See ***correction*** above.) > > I hate email sometimes... No ability to edit when you make a dumb > typing mistake. Sorry.
I don't understand what you consider "not a function" though. It is a function with constrained form, but a function nevertheless since it takes a text/markup parameter. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
