Knut Petersen <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> Would you show us the GUB's whole lilypond-doc log file? >>> If you preserve the 2.19.81 (Jan. 2018) lilypond-doc log file, >>> I'd like to compare the 2.19.82 log file (broken PDFs) >>> and the 2.19.81 log file (correct PDFs). >>> >> >> Zipped versions of both log files are attached. Hope this helps. > > To me both logs prove that building of e.g. the english notation.pdf > succeeded and that the survival of the original pdf generated by xetex > is impossible. Unfortunately reality proves something different.
Can it be verified whether or not the logs stem from a run actually producing the respective valid and/or invalid PDF files or not? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
