On 2020-02-23 4:47 am, Thomas Morley wrote:
consider the following code

\version "2.19.84"
\markup \dynamic { s f m z p r }

output attached.

And compare with the output of

\version "2.19.84"
{ R1 }
\markup \dynamic { s f m z p r }

The markup does not use the same font (from visual inspection). Most
noticeable with "z", but the others are slightly off as well.

I cannot reproduce against 2.19.84 I installed from the linux-64 sh script. (lilybin.com running 2.19.55 also behaves as expected.) The dynamics font looks the same regardless of the presence of a score.

Could this be an issue with font caching?


-- Aaron Hill

_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Reply via email to