Hello,

[the best place to discuss m4 bugs is bug-m4, so I'm moving the
discussion there]

On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 07:38:26PM +0100, Sam Lauber wrote:
> "It is safe to call `m4wrap' from saved text, but the order 
> in which the saved text is read is undefined."
> 
> I do not understand that paragraph, and I think it should be
> changed to a more understandable form.

I think I understand it:
1) it's not an error to call m4wrap in the text saved by m4wrap.
2) the text will be read back before m4 exits, but you cannot say when;
it may be after all other texts saved by m4wrap so far, or between two
of them; I suppose that no text saved by m4wrap will be interrupted by
another text saved this way.

Well, I see now that this formulation leaves space for various
interpretation.

Thank you for reporting this problem.  If you have capacities to help
even more, you could perhaps suggest an explanation.  The developers
would check that it describes what they meant to promise, and update
the documentation.

Thanks,
        Stepan Kasal


_______________________________________________
Bug-m4 mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-m4

Reply via email to