Hi Eric, * Eric Blake wrote on Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 09:36:41PM CEST: > > > > M4 upgrade scenario:
> Indeed, I will not allow CVS M4 to be released as m4-2.0 until I am > satisfied that this very scenario works without regressions Good. Well, my testing then has two results: one bug in Autoconf and... > > * bin/autoupdate.in (handle_autoconf_macros): Do not > > _au__undefine the builtins that aren't defined, before restoring > > the original ones. Fixes warnings issues by CVS M4. > > That is safe, but I'd rather figure out the underlying cause of why > CVS m4 is not defining builtins in the first place. ...one likely bug in CVS m4. Sounds to me like we should rather not apply this second patch: exposing a potential issue is better than hiding it; after all, those were only warnings, and only for a not-so- often used tool. Cheers, Ralf _______________________________________________ Bug-m4 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-m4
