Hi, Sergey. Thank you for your response. I would like to clear up, as best we can, these email problems, and then, by all means, I would like to get back to the IMAP server questions. I noted (see headers below) that you responded to the message that I sent to [email protected] on August 17. Did you ever receive the previous, nearly identical, message that I sent to [email protected] on August 13? Please let me know if my emails are getting through, and which email address you would prefer that I use. I am also sending a nearly identical copy of this message to [email protected] to insure that at least one of them gets through.
Thank you, Gary ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:40:45 +0300 From: Sergey Poznyakoff <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [bug-mailutils] is Sergey Poznyakoff OK? In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:36:29 -0400 <e1md2o0-0000wx...@lornasim> References: <e1md2o0-0000wx...@lornasim> Hi Gary, > 1. I needed to see what was being communicated between the IMAP server and > the mail program. I couldn't figure out how to set "imap4d_transcript" from > the command line, It is set in imap4d configuration file, in section "server", like this; server 0.0.0.0:143 { transcript yes; } > 2. The problem I am having with the directories graying out may be due to my > inexperience at this, since I have never before attempted to set up an IMAP > server. I don't quite understand what exactly "graying" means. Is it some way to represent folder attributes? If so, what attributes? > Would you kindly tell me what directory structure is normally > expected by an IMAP server, There are no restrictions on mailbox and directory structure. Any directory hierarchy is understood. > (I really don't yet understand how the following code works: > > if (record->_is_scheme) > return record->_is_scheme (record, url, flags); The `_is_scheme' is a "virtual method" which is defined in the library responsible for the particular mailbox implementation (e.g. in libmu_maildir, for mailboxes in maildir format). > source code package), and some of them refer to a namespace that would start > with "mh:" or "#mh" in my case. Should I put one of these in as a namespace > parameter in the mail program? No, the "namespace" directive has nothing to do with the mailbox types. Regards, Sergey _______________________________________________ Bug-mailutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-mailutils
