On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 16:59, Michael Witten <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 17:14, Paul Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 18:49 -0500, Michael Witten wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 00:00, Paul Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 03:52 -0500, Michael Witten wrote: >>> >> > Thus, it makes most sense for `--dry-run' (`-n') to mask `--touch' >>> >> > (`-t') >>> >> > rather than the other way around (which is the current, buggy, >>> >> > unexpected, >>> >> > possibly ruinous behavior). >>> > >>> > This patch seems correct to me. >>> >>> Is this discussions finished then? >> >> Yes, I will make this fix. > > Are you still planning to commit my patch? > > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-make/2011-03/msg00000.html
Hello? _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
