On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Tim Murphy <tnmur...@gmail.com> wrote: > I had a little look at libtdl. To be brutal I thought that using > dlopen/LoadLibrary directly was *much* easier. There isn't really > anything madly complicated about what's being done.
To clarify: when I originally spoke about APR, I was not suggesting that GNU make actually incorporate and use APR but just that useful bits of library-loading code could be stolen from it. And I assume the same could go for libltdl. It might be worth at least looking at these just to make sure you don't paint yourself into a corner API-wise vis-a-vis HPUX or OS X or whatever. David B _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
