Follow-up Comment #7, bug #33138 (project make):

> I agree this seems useful. However, since it would involve changes
> to existing code which are not strictly needed...

Not functional changes, just  a little refactoring, and adding a new reliance
on tmpfile() may cause more stress to ports than enhancing the existing use of
mkstemp(). But I agree, this patch has reached the point where it needs an
up-or-down vote from Paul et al before any such final finish work is done.

David

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?33138>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/


_______________________________________________
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make

Reply via email to