On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Frank Heckenbach <f.heckenb...@fh-soft.de>wrote
> > This might be right (I was just objecting to your claim that it was > necessarily so on any 32-bit Unix), and I'd prefer to use fd's > anyway. > Well ... Linux is not Unix, as partisans will proudly tell you, so technically what I said is unobjectionable. I won't pretend that that's what I meant though. Presumably the real distinction is between statically and dynamically linked binaries; anything linked statically with libc would need to contain an actual FILE struct, not just a pointer to one. But that aside, we're all in violent agreement so we can let this sub-thread drop. -David
_______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
