> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 08:57:23 +0100
> From: Tim Murphy <tnmur...@gmail.com>
> Cc: "Paul D. Smith" <psm...@gnu.org>, "bug-make@gnu.org" <bug-make@gnu.org>
>
> Since you can't (in my recent experience) load a 64-bit DLL into a 32-bit
> program, the real issue is what architecture was make itself built with.
That's unrelated. I was talking about the fact that
load foo.so
is inherently non-portable, whereas
load foo
or
load foo$(SOEXT)
(with $(SOEXT) determined automatically by Make) is much more
portable.
_______________________________________________
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
