Will do. Eddy
vin., 19 oct. 2018, 16:52 Paul Smith <psm...@gnu.org> a scris: > On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 09:26 +0300, Eddy Petrișor wrote: > > I have a similar issue, but in my case I used explicit pattern rules, > > vpath and added compiler generated .d files to make sure the object > > files are regenerated on .h modification, but the end result was that > > the pattern rules were no longer called after the initial generation. > > > > My tentative explanation is that the .d dependency rules are > > considered more specific (but empty) than the pattern rules and/or > > vpath is at fault, also. > > > > Is this explanation correct? Will the issue also appear in the > > solution above? > > I'm sorry but I don't understand your description. If you would like > some help please post a minimal, complete example (and create a new > mailing list thread for it). Cheers! > >
_______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
