On 7/25/22 11:06, Edward Welbourne wrote:
>> Also, this new feature smells like it may open up some interesting
>> corner-cases in dependency-loop analysis, although I can't think of
>> any immediately.
Alejandro Colomar (Monday, July 25, 2022 13:54) replied:
> The same way that having dep loops right now is an error, I'd just
> throw an error if a post-requisite creates a dependency loop.
oh, absolutely - I wasn't suggesting this was a case against the
proposal - only pointing it out as one more area that's going to need a
bit more thought, to look for new and interesting ways that dependency
loops can arise. How those get handled once detected is, of course,
business as usual.
Eddy.
