Follow-up Comment #3, bug #67265 (group make): 1. The point of the bug report is that $(file) *should be* processed later than other $(...) constructs. Having said that, it would probably be sufficient, and perhaps a less invasive change, to do $(...) expansion of *each line of a command list* independently, after execution of the previous line.
2. I am already aware of several alternative ways to do the same operation
that would avoid the bug. The existence of those alternatives does not mean
the current behavior of $(file) isn't a bug.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?67265>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
