A NOTE has been added to this issue. ====================================================================== https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4897 ====================================================================== Reported By: phil Assigned To: bwalton ====================================================================== Project: ruby18 Issue ID: 4897 Category: regular use Reproducibility: always Severity: major Priority: normal Status: feedback ====================================================================== Date Submitted: 2012-02-13 20:49 CET Last Modified: 2012-02-14 01:48 CET ====================================================================== Summary: ruby 18 on sparc poorly optimized Description: On the same sparc machine, on solaris 10, running the same test (http://www.thebuzzmedia.com/ruby-19-quick-speed-test/) takes 3 times as long as a locally compiled ruby. ======================================================================
---------------------------------------------------------------------- (0009602) phil (reporter) - 2012-02-14 01:48 https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4897#c9602 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- oh. well, the default deploy is for gcc, anyways. I guess the only difference I see on my side looking at configs, etc. is v8 vs v8plus. But that doesnt explain the x86 performance difference. then again... -xarch=386 (and SOS11) vs just regular xO2.. and SOS12? But both x86 executables are type ELF 32-bit LSB executable 80386 Version 1 [FPU], dynamically linked _______________________________________________ bug-notifications mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-notifications
