A NOTE has been added to this issue. ====================================================================== https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=5064 ====================================================================== Reported By: pfelecan Assigned To: ====================================================================== Project: libqtcore4_gxx Issue ID: 5064 Category: Reproducibility: N/A Severity: feature Priority: normal Status: new ====================================================================== Date Submitted: 2013-03-28 11:01 CET Last Modified: 2013-03-28 11:16 CET ====================================================================== Summary: don't use _gxx suffix or gxx installation tree Description: I propose to abandon the suffix and the gxx tree:
1. there is no other instance of Qt 2. our main-line compiler is gcc, thus gxx for C++ What do you think? ====================================================================== ---------------------------------------------------------------------- (0010307) cgrzemba (manager) - 2013-03-28 11:16 https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=5064#c10307 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- at first: yes unless we try to build QT with SOS sometime. but the problem I have is a build cycle takes much time and rebuild failed recently (because some updates on the buildfarm?). _______________________________________________ bug-notifications mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-notifications
