On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 02:31:04AM +0200, K.G. wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 01:19:48 +0200 > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 06:56:44PM +0200, K.G. wrote: > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > The devel branch is now totally out of sync with the recent progress > > > made in stable, and just correspond to an old stable version. > > > > > > Maybe we could just drop it and use a real CVS branch instead ? > > > That would allow us to apply patches from stable to devel, and in the > > > meantime to start some more deeper modifications if we want to. > > > > What about moving to subversion or some other more modern revision control > > system ? > > Yeah subversion looks really cool (I just read the manual today :) > > Which are the other modern revision control systems ?
arch, bazzar, darcs, git , not sure if they are other. We already have a subversion repo on aliot though, which i use for the debian packaging of parted, and migration can be instantaneous, and i believe the ue of subversion over the other solution is much less barrier to entry than the other systems. Friendly, Sven Luther _______________________________________________ Bug-parted mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted
