On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 08:30:00AM +0200, K.G. wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:25:26 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 11:41:44AM -0700, Jen, Janet (Windows IPF Engineer) > > wrote: > > > Dear reviewers, > > > Have the changes in parted passed your review? > > Sorry, I totally forgot your issue. > > > > Please remove the copyright notices all over the code. > > This is not necesssary, we are keeping an accurate change log > > to track copyright. > > Don't contributions need to be copyright assigned to the FSF anymore ?
I don't see the connection between your question and the text you quoted above it. Perhaps "track copyright" is ambiguous: the AUTHORS file (and also the ChangeLog file) keeps track of who wrote what. This is "copyright information" useful for enforcing the FSF's copyright and proving that the FSF has the right to distribute Parted. BTW: when you submit a patch, your patch should include changes to ChangeLog and AUTHORS. Cheers, Andrew _______________________________________________ Bug-parted mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted
