"Leslie P. Polzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> It is a bit annoying, but --set-scripts-executable does the right >> thing in about 97% of cases. That can be made the default quite >> easily. > > Of course, if it is evident that monotone/git/mercurial/anything else > is way better, we would use this. Bazaar (old and new) seems to be > way inferior to darcs.
Anything is inferior to darcs regarting to merging capability. I like darcs a lot but would be good to you check the current alternatives. The ones that I know are: - git / cogito - bzr (bazaar-ng) - darcs - svn / svk Personally I prefer bzr, git or darcs. There's an interesting read in http://debian.feedjack.org/user/294/tag/darcs/ Please read and we discuss it later. >> Debian Installer does it. We have a parted_server that has every >> command queued there and then when the user ask it, it saves >> everything together. Might help here. > Where can we get it? Will it integrate well? It's how d-i uses parted and might be a start code to check. http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/d-i/trunk/packages/partman/partman-base/parted_server.c?op=file&rev=0&sc=0 > Also, what about the po4a stuff you added? Do we really need that? > Isn't gettext sufficient? po4a is the way I found to allow people to translate the manpages and gettext cannot do that. -- O T A V I O S A L V A D O R --------------------------------------------- E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio --------------------------------------------- "Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house." _______________________________________________ bug-parted mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted
