On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 02:20:44PM -0600, Curtis Gedak wrote: > Peter Breitenlohner wrote: >>> .... Did you test >>> your patch. Does it really fix the fact that that the test does not >>> PASS. ... >> >> Yes, of course. The result was the same when running the test via my >> build+check+install script or when running 'make check' interactively >> in the >> tests/ directory (of the build tree): FAIL without the patch, PASS >> with it. >> >>> ... judging by your output, adding a "n" to the end of the string >>> will not make it succeed. >> >> The difference is that the test (t7000-scripting) asks a question >> ansered by >> 'n', whereas the example doesn't ask. Thus the "echo n |" is ignored and >> has no effect. > > I too am experiencing a similar problem with failed tests when I run > "make check" on parted-1.9.0. > > I do not have the readline package installed and hence configure the > code with: > > ./configure --without-readline >
I just checked in my environment and this seems to work for me. The test passes even though I do a ./configure --without-readline. Please note that I am in next branch, not in master. If you have not done your tests in the next branch, I strongly suggest you repeat and post your output. Regards. > Perhaps the failure of the two tests is related to whether readline is > installed or not? > > Regards, > Curtis Gedak > > > _______________________________________________ > bug-parted mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted -- Joel Andres Granados Brno, Czech Republic, Red Hat.
pgpsA6iHQAnY8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ bug-parted mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted
