Phillip Susi wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 20:49 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> I'm not happy with these changes yet, mainly because of the lack of tests,
>> but also because I just tried to add a couple partitions (in free space),
>> and each time, I got this:
>>
>> $ sudo ./parted -s $dev u B mkpart F13-root $s2 $e2
>> Warning: WARNING: the kernel failed to re-read the partition table on
>> /dev/sda (Device or resource busy). As a result, it may not reflect all
>> of your changes until after reboot.
>>
>> I thought the intent was to avoid such warnings when they do not apply.
>> The kernel was indeed notified of the creation of the two new
>> partitions, and I was able to create file systems on them.
>
> Indeed, it does not look like you have the patch applied since according
> to the last mail you send with the modification you made, it would be
> saying:
No. That diagnostic comes from
_kernel_reread_part_table (PedDevice* dev)
...
sync();
while (ioctl (arch_specific->fd, BLKRRPART)) {
retry_count--;
sync();
if (retry_count == 3)
sleep(1); /* Pause to allow system to settle */
if (!retry_count) {
...
_("WARNING: the kernel failed to re-read the partition "
> "Partition(s) %s on %s have been written, but we have been unable to
> inform the kernel of the change, probably because it/they are in use.
> As a result, the old partition(s) will remain in use. You should reboot
> now before making further changes."
>
> Maybe you ran the old binary instead of the one you just compiled by
> mistake?
No. I'm certain that I ran the right binary.
Invoking "sudo ./parted ..." is not ambiguous.
Just didn't have time to debug it.
_______________________________________________
bug-parted mailing list
bug-parted@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted
